Developer tools1 sources·Published

Transparent usage-billed LLM API gateway after subscription and markup fatigue

A heavy OpenCode/Claude Code user describes burning through a $200 MAX subscription in about an hour, then getting burned by relay stations with opaque billing (one charged $7 for a single Opus task; another drained a top-up in a few embedding calls with bills that didn't add up). They settled on a gateway with per-token pricing and an auditable usage ledger — evidence that billing transparency, not price alone, is the switching factor for AI API intermediaries.

Score 721 sourcesConfidence 68%

The problem

Developers using coding agents face unpredictable subscription burn and relay stations whose billing is opaque or inflated. The pain is not access to models but trust: usage details must be queryable in real time and reconcile with actual token counts, and one key should cover many models.

What could be built

An OpenAI-compatible multi-model gateway competing on verifiable billing: real-time usage ledger, per-request cost breakdown, token-count verification endpoint, one key across GPT/Claude/Gemini/DeepSeek. Target agent users whose subscriptions run out mid-month.

Who it's for

Claude Code / OpenCode heavy usersdevelopers mixing multiple LLM providersusers burned by opaque API resellers

Who is talking1

Related topics

LLM API gatewayusage-based billingClaude Codecost transparency

Summaries are AI-generated. The original words are in the threads above.